Back in September 2019 a woman in Berkeley California paid her house off in full to the mortgage company  but they flatly rejected her "tender of full payoff" and took her home to foreclosure auction instead!   These are lawyers whose specialty is mortgage debt collection where all it took was a phone call to cancel that trustee sale, upon getting Paid In Full, according to THE WRITTEN CONTRACT THEY ENTERED, and as the law required.    These companies and LAWYERS  REFUSED FULL PAYMENT FROM HOMEOWNER BUT took the SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY FROM THE WINNING BIDDER!    

In the two years since, while this homeowner defended her right to her home by law, recently on October 21, 2021 this company now wants to off-load their position to an unsuspecting new "buyer."  WHILE WE ARE ON APPEAL IN COURT!   How?
 
Homeowner is proving this company does NOT have title nor does it own the property nor has right to represent they do!  They own a LIEN ONLY, and they can't prove their lien is valid!      BUYER BEWARE. Any realtor or buyer who attempts to ty to buy our home will force themselves into litigation as we continue on Appeal and our CURRENT higher court lawsuit.     See above "Unwavering Offer to Pay."

What kind of court would even approve of evicting this homeowner, in light of an illegal auction conducted in this way?   This question is examined carefully amidst the anguish of a woman who was compelled to find out, in order to defend against wrongs of any such "court."

Homeowner's Right by Law of Equitable Redemption was thus violated, a universally-recognized principle and law in all fifty states.  Indeed a rightful remedy is wanting.  So we must seek a court of equity, which is justice by rule of LAW.
         

She says NO to being utterly plundered of over $800,000 of HER FAMILY'S EQUITY by the grossly underpriced steal of a bid, along with losing the house itself in this manner,   NO to being unjustly made homeless and destitute because of a foreclosure auction that the law required to be immediately cancelled, her only retirement income derived from the same home, and she with no spouse, no other dwelling to move to, late-50s in age, with young adult children, nieces, nephews also with children of their own, four generations represented as matriarch after her late parents who entrusted her to so steward.   NO.     "Equity will not suffer a wrong to be without a remedy."
       
YES SHE STILL HAS HER HOME, remains in lawful possession defending her rights in and out of court.  She calls for that illegal foreclosure auction to be rescinded and unwound as required by Law and the Facts.     She is also hugely indignant on behalf of neighbors' home values attacked by these reckless blatantly unconstitutional lawless practices. 
 

Since that unbelievable day last September 25, 2019  we have borne grave unjust injury by these lawless attackers, when they were made whole but chose to inflict continued unjust  unlawful injury instead.   We are forced to defend.